The world's biggest defence budgets
The ten biggest defence budgets for 2010 add up to a total of more than $1.1 trillion, according to the latest Military Balance report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies
(IISS), a think-tank. The defence budget of America alone, at $693 billion, accounts
for more than 60% of the total. But when defence spending is compared to the
overall size of each country's economy, Saudi Arabia tops the list. It spends
over 10% of GDP on defence, more than double the proportion spent by
America. China ranks second in the world's biggest defence budgets
(spending some $76 billion) and also boasts the largest armed forces. Only
America, India, Russia and North Korea (not shown) have more than 1m military
personnel. Defence budgets have grown since 2005, but the balance of military
power may be shifting. Western countries, many of which are engaged in
Afghanistan, now face budget constrains and cuts, whilst emerging economies,
such as Brazil and China, have increased military spending in line with
economic growth.
Defence Budget 2013-14: Key Statistics
With
the modest growth in the new defence budget, its key indicators show a downward
revision except for the percentage share of the capital expenditure in the
total defence budget (see Table I). Of note is the further decline of the share
of the defence budget in GDP, which is now the lowest over the past five
decades since 1961-62 when it was only 1.66.
Table
I: Comparative Statistics of Defence Budgets, 2011-12 & 2012-13
2012-13
|
2013-14
|
|
Defence Budget (Rs. in
Crore)
|
1,93,407.29
|
2,03,672.12
|
Growth of Defence Budget
(%)
|
17.63
|
5.31
|
Revenue Expenditure (Rs. in
Crore)
|
1,13,828.66
|
1,16,931.41
|
Growth of Revenue
Expenditure (%)
|
19.55
|
2.73
|
Share of Revenue
Expenditure in Defence Budget (%)
|
58.85
|
57.41
|
Capital Expenditure (Rs. in
Crore)
|
79,578.63
|
86,740.71
|
Growth of Capital
Expenditure (%)
|
15.00
|
9.00
|
Share of Capital
Expenditure in Defence Budget (%)
|
41.15
|
42.59
|
Share of Defence Budget in
GDP (%)
|
1.90
|
1.79
|
Share of Defence Budget in
Central Government Expenditure (%)
|
12.97
|
12.23
|
Note:
Rs. 1.0 crore = Rs. 10 million = US$ 183,637.4 (as per the average exchange
rate for the first 11 months of 2012-13)
Share of Defence Services
The
Army with an approximate budget of Rs. 99,707.8 crore accounts for 49 per cent
of the latest defence budget, followed by the Air Force (Rs. 57,502.9 crore),
Navy (Rs. 36,343.5 crore), Defence Research and Development Organisation (Rs.
10,610.2 crore) and Ordnance Factories (Rs. 508.7 crore) (see Figure I). It is
noteworthy that compared to the previous budget, the Air Force is the only
service which has increased its share in the total defence allocation (from
24.9 per cent to 28.2 per cent). The Navy’s share has decreased the most (by
1.4 percentage points), whereas the Army’s and DRDO’s shares have declined by
1.3 and 0.3 percentage points, respectively. It is also noteworthy that except
for the Air Force, which has seen an increase in both the revenue expenditure
and capital expenditure, the others have a decline in one of these heads. Figure I: %Share of Services in Defence Budget 2013-14
Note:
Share of services is exclusive of the Rs. 16.5 crore allocated under the heads
of ‘Inspection’, ‘Prototype development under Make Procedure’ and ‘Others’.
Impact on Modernisation
The
Indian armed forces are on a massive modernisation process, although the
intensity varies from one service to another. Besides the existing ones,
contracts worth several billions of dollars are expected to be signed in
2013-14. Among the services, the Air Force, the most capital intensive service,
is expected to sign the $15-20 billion contract for 126 French Rafale fighters
early in the next financial year. Besides, it has already selected the
prospective suppliers for at least three more big contracts – 22 Boeing AH-64D
Apache Longbow attack helicopters ($1.2 billion); 15 Boeing CH-47F Chinook
heavy lift helicopters ($1.4 billion), and six Airbus A330 Multi Role Tanker
Transport ($1.0 billion) – which are expected to be signed in the near future.
The Navy is also expected to sign a $1.0 billion contract for 16 multi-role
helicopters, which is at an advance stage of vendor selection. The Army on its
part is hoping that its much delayed artillery programme finally gets going in
2013, with the procurement of 145 ultra-light howitzers ($647 million).
Given
the long list of new acquisition proposals, the question is how much the new
defence budget supports it. It is most noteworthy that the modernisation budget
is earmarked for committed liabilities, with little money available for new
schemes. For instance, for the years 2011-12 and 2012-13, the overall ratio
between these stands at roughly 85:15, although there exists a significant
variation among the services and between the years. Nonetheless, assuming the
same ratio in the new allocation, total available funds for new schemes would
be little over Rs. 11,000 crore, which is probably enough for the first stage
payment towards the Rafale deal. This means that there is very little money
available for other new schemes including of the Air Force, which, despite
having a 30 per cent hike in its modernisation budget, would still need more
money to sustain its modernisation drive. For the Army and Navy, the resource
constraint is more severe, with negative growth in their respective
modernisation budgets (Table II).
Table
II: Allocation for Modernisation of Armed Forces
BE
2012-13 (Rs in Cr)
|
RE
2012-13 (Rs in Cr)
|
Under/over
Spending (Rs in Cr)
|
Under/over
Spending (%)
|
BE
2013-14 (Rs in Cr)
|
%
Growth of BE 2013-14 over BE 2012-13
|
|
Army
|
13804.02
|
11568.76
|
2235.26
|
16.19
|
13327.04
|
-3.46
|
Navy
|
24151.51
|
17651.51
|
6500
|
26.91
|
23478.78
|
-2.79
|
Air
Force
|
28503.9
|
28575.99
|
-72.09
|
-0.25
|
37048.06
|
29.98
|
Total
|
66459.43
|
57796.26
|
8663.17
|
13.04
|
73853.88
|
11.13
|
Note:
In columns 4 and 5, plus figures denote under-utilization and minus figures
over-utilization. China and Russia could be put in the category of potential adversaries.
Another way to visualize this is to
combine all the world’s military spending together. At the height of the Iraq
war, U.S. spending was above half of all the world’s military spending, but is
now down to slightly above 40% of all military spending. Sequestration would
take it down by about 2 percentage points more of the pie, roughly 38% of all
global military spending, excluding any likely contingency or war spending.
Indeed, it is only in terms of percent of
GDP that the U.S. is not ahead, in second place to Saudi Arabia. But here
again, sequestration doesn’t change the overall ranking.
No comments:
Post a Comment